Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hurd v. Hurd, 219 P.3d 258.
- Peace v. Peace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- McNeil v. Goff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
McNeil v. Goff
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 16, (explaining that the trier of fact is in the best position to weigh the evidence); Brown v. U.S. Fid.
- Boyle v. Boyle 290 P.3d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Boyle v. Boyle
290 P.3d 456
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
A family court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, ¶ 8 , or making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support, ¶ 19
- Mahar v. Acuna, II 287 P.3d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
-
Mahar v. Acuna, II
287 P.3d 824
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
A court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion or “‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” quoting State ex rel.