Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Estate of Newman, 196 P.3d 863.

63 citing documents.

State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sage v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sage v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 13, (stating legal conclusions are reviewed de novo); Purvis v. Hartford Accident & Indem.
Williams v. Cole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Williams v. Cole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Caruthers v. Underhill 326 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶45 , 1 Dan B. Dobbs, Law of Remedies § 2.6(2), at 153 (2d ed.1993) [hereinafter 1 Dobbs].
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶21 The foregoing demonstrates, if nothing else, that ―[t]he legislature is capable of saying what it means.‖
Grand v. Nacchio 217 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Grand v. Nacchio 217 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
so that no part will be void, inert, redundant or trivial’ ”
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
so that no part will be void, inert, redundant or trivial.’”