Cited by

¶ 11 (App. 2013) (parenting time); ¶ 21 (App. 2008) (child support).

¶ 10 (App. 2008) ( n.4 (1981)).

The community share of a pension plan such as PSPRS “is determined by dividing the length of time worked during the marriage by the total length of time worked toward earning the pension.” ¶ 10 (App. 2008) (citation omitted); (recognizing that a non-employee spouse may be awarded her community interest in the employee spouse’s pension benefits under either the “present cash value method” or the “reserved jurisdiction method”).

¶ 24 (App. 2008) (noting that where the "'parent would be paid the same wages regardless of whether the parent decided to accept or to decline employer-paid health-insurance coverage.

¶ 18 (App. 2008).2 A. The Bank Accounts.

¶ 27 , (“The receipt of employment benefits that ‘are significant and reduce personal living expenses’ affects a parent’s ability to pay child support and should be considered as income to that parent.”) (citing Guidelines § 5(D)).

Three of the cases, -42, -09 (1981), involve pension issues and discuss the present cash value method vs. the reserved jurisdiction method of apportioning pensions.

¶ 11, (holding that the present cash value method relieves the former spouses from “further entanglement” with the possibility of court involvement and enforcement issues); Johnson, 131 Ariz. at 41-42, 638 P.2d at 708-09.

¶ 5 “[W]e will not disturb a court’s award of child support absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 21

“Although we will not disturb a court’s award of child support absent an abuse of its discretion, we will review its interpretation of the Guidelines de novo as a question of law.” ¶ 21 , (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).