Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Estate of Zilles, 200 P.3d 1024.
- Champagne v. Bozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Champagne v. Bozer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 8 (App. 2008) (noting the goal in interpreting a trust provision is to “ascertain the intent of the trustor” by “consider[ing] the text of the trust as a whole”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
- Alan v. Lober Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Alan v. Lober
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (App. 2008) (extrinsic evidence is not admissible to contradict the plain language of a trust).
- Fellers v. Norris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Fellers v. Norris
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
When interpreting a trust document, the goal is to “ascertain the intent of the trustor.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
- Newbanks v. Newbanks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Newbanks v. Newbanks
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 9 (App. 2012); ¶ 8 (App. 2008)
- Hiatt v. Hiatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Hiatt v. Hiatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Fellers v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Fellers v. Bailey
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶10 Our goal in interpreting a trust provision is to “ascertain the intent of the trustor.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
- Taylor v. Credille Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Taylor v. Credille Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Mulcaire v. Mulcaire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Mulcaire v. Mulcaire
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In construing a trust, the ultimate goal is to determine the intent of the trustor, ¶ 9, and when the language of the trust is clear, the court will not look outside of the trust to determine that intent, ¶ 9
- masci/mcalister v. Masci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- masci/mcalister v. Masci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Mulcaire v. mongini/wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Mulcaire v. mongini/wallace
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 8, In re Gardiner’s Estate
- In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Kaz Construction, Inc v. Sierra Cobre Estates, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
-
Kaz Construction, Inc v. Sierra Cobre Estates, LLC
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(relevant intent is that of trustor at time of creation of trust); (when intent plainly expressed, court will not go outside terms of instrument to interpret).
- In Re Estate of King 269 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- In Re Estate of King 269 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012