Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma County, 209 P.3d 179.

69 citing documents.

Turner v. Steiner 398 P.3d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Turner v. Steiner 398 P.3d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Park, , 47 ¶ 16, (“Our Legislature did not choose this particular language, however, and we are ‘not at liberty to rewrite the statute under the guise of judicial interpretation.’ ”) ( , ).
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Minch v. Azbn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Park, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (); see also City of Phx.
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Manuel Fernando Florez 384 P.3d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 376 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 376 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Park v. Yuma Cty., LLC, ¶ 12 (App. 2009) (explaining that the “plain language” of a statute is the best indicator of its meaning).
Nelson v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Nelson v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Park v. Yuma Cty., LLC, ¶ 12 (App. 2009).
Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence 359 P.3d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Grubaugh v. Hon blomo/lawrence 359 P.3d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Park, ¶ 12, see also Maycock v. Asilomar Dev.
Phillips v. Garcia 351 P.3d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Phillips v. Garcia 351 P.3d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Winckler v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Winckler v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. 342 P.3d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. 342 P.3d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Park, L.L.C. v. Yuma County, LLC, ¶ 12
Midfirst v. Barness Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midfirst v. Barness Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McNamara v. Citizens Protecting Tax Payers 337 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McNamara v. Citizens Protecting Tax Payers 337 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Park, (Courts “are not at liberty to rewrite .
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLC 334 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard 334 P.3d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLC 334 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Park, (internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Gill 333 P.3d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gill 333 P.3d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See New Sun Business Park, ¶ 15, (regarding the last antecedent rule); Advanced Property Tax Liens, ¶ 14, (considering “the language and sentence structure” in interpreting a statute to “harmonize” its provisions).
Newman v. Cornerstone National Insurance 322 P.3d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Newman v. Cornerstone National Insurance 322 P.3d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tucson Unified School District v. Gallagher Corum 322 P.3d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Tucson Unified School District v. Gallagher Corum 322 P.3d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Steinberger v. McVey 318 P.3d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Steinberger v. McVey 318 P.3d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Park, ¶ 12 , (citing Nordstrom, ¶ 10 , ) ("When determining the meaning of a statute, we first look to the plain language of the statute as the most reliable indicator of its meaning.”).
In Re the ESTATE OF Sanford M. BOLTON 315 P.3d 1241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re the ESTATE OF Sanford M. BOLTON 315 P.3d 1241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Jones 306 P.3d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Jones 306 P.3d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Melendez v. Hallmark Insurance 305 P.3d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 302 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by