Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Marriage of Inboden, 225 P.3d 599.
- Walsh v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“In most cases, dividing jointly held property substantially equally will be the most equitable unless there exists a sound reason to divide the property otherwise.” ¶ 6
- Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Stewart v. Stewart
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The family court relied on In re Marriage of Inboden, which held that “when a spouse places separate property in joint tenancy with the other spouse a presumed gift occurs[.]” ¶ 9
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Caskey v. Battani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Caskey v. Battani
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“The family court has broad discretion in determining what allocation of property and debt is equitable under the circumstances.” ¶ 7, (citation omitted).