Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Marriage of Inboden, 225 P.3d 599.

59 citing documents.

  • Walsh v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “In most cases, dividing jointly held property substantially equally will be the most equitable unless there exists a sound reason to divide the property otherwise.” ¶ 6
  • Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    The family court relied on In re Marriage of Inboden, which held that “when a spouse places separate property in joint tenancy with the other spouse a presumed gift occurs[.]” ¶ 9
  • Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Caskey v. Battani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Caskey v. Battani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “The family court has broad discretion in determining what allocation of property and debt is equitable under the circumstances.” ¶ 7, (citation omitted).