Cited by

§ 25-318(A), which provides that the court must “divide the community, joint tenancy and other property held in common equitably, though not necessarily in kind[.]” “[T]he general principle is that ‘all marital joint property should be divided substantially equally unless sound reason exists to divide the property otherwise.’” ¶ 13 (App. 2010) (quoting Toth, 190 Ariz. at 221).

§ 25-318(A); –35 ¶ 12 (App. 2010).

¶ 24 (App. 2010) ("Division of property upon dissolution should .

(citation omitted)); see also 5 ¶ 24 (App. 2010) ("Because debt incurred during marriage is presumed to be community in nature, the spouse contesting this characterization must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the debt is actually a separate obligation.").

¶10 “In determining an equitable division, the family court has broad discretion in the specific allocation of individual assets and liabilities.” ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Generally, “all debt incurred by either spouse during marriage is presumed a community obligation.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).

§ 25-211(A); ¶ 12 (App. 2010).

-35, ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (citing A.R.S.

In re Marriage of Flower , , ¶ 13, quoting Toth v. Toth , , 221

¶ 14 (App. 2010) (citations omitted).

Family Court Distribution of Property ¶7 Before dividing the assets, the court discussed “equitable division” and cited to

liabilities.” ¶ 14 (App. 2010).

Wife created the artwork; therefore, awarding it to her was fair and equitable and not an abuse of discretion.3 ¶ 14, (stating “the court may consider other factors that bear on the equities of a particular case” in equitably dividing community property).