Cited by

§§ 32-2153, 32-2154, 32-2160, 32-2165; ¶¶ 1, 4, 9, 20-21, 30 (App. 2009).

One element of an unjust enrichment claim is “the absence of any remedy at law.” ¶ 29 (App. 2009).

Brown asserted the unjust enrichment claim and had the burden to show “(1) an enrichment, (2) an impoverishment, (3) a connection between the two, (4) the absence of justification for the enrichment and impoverishment and (5) the absence of any remedy at law.” ¶ 29 (App. 2009).

¶ 6 (App. 2008); ¶ 15 (App. 2009); ¶ 7 (App. 2008) (“We review de novo a trial court’s determination that a party’s notice of claim failed to comply with [A.R.S.]

¶ 25 (App. 2009) (remainder of a contract containing a void provision is enforceable if the contract clearly shows the parties intended it to be severable).

3 LEWIS v. STATE, ¶ 6 (App. 2008); ¶ 15 (App. 2009); ¶ 7 (App. 2008) (“We review de novo a trial court’s determination that a party’s notice of claim failed to comply with [A.R.S.]

7 WHILES, et al. v. JONES, et al. Decision of the Court ¶16 Typically, “even if one part of a severable contract is void, the court may enforce the remainder of the contract.” ¶ 25 (App. 2009) ().

Landi v. Arkules , , 136, , 468 (App. 1992) ; see also Mousa v. Saba , , 587, ¶ 27, , 1044 (App. 2009) (denying the plaintiff recovery in unjust enrichment for performance of illegal broker services); Peterson v. Anderson , , 113, , 171 (App. 1987) (denying recovery for a contract claim of an out-of-state attorney seeking payment pursuant to a fee

As noted, to succeed on an unjust enrichment claim, “a party must show ‘the absence of any remedy at law.” Loiselle, 224 Ariz. at 211, ¶ 14, ( ¶ 29, ).

See, ¶ 20, (stating that an unlicensed individual could not maintain an action for compensation for services that required a real estate license); Realty Execs., Inc. v. Northrup, King & Co., –03, –17 (1975) (finding that a brokerage firm was barr

Factual and Procedural Background ¶2 “We view the facts and the inferences to be drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom [summary] judgment was entered.”

Factual and Procedural Background ¶2 “We view the facts and the inferences to be drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom [summary] judgment was entered.”

To recover on a claim for unjust enrichment, a claimant must show “(1) an enrichment, (2) an impoverishment, (3) a connection between the two, (4) the absence of justification for the enrichment and impoverishment and (5) the absence of any remedy at law.” ¶ 29