Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C., 276 P.3d 11.

80 citing documents.

Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Webster v. Windsong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Webster v. Windsong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 89 (App. 2012).
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., quoting James, Cooke & Hobson, Inc., 177 Ariz. at 319, 868 P.2d at 332.
Brumett v. Mga Home Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brumett v. Mga Home Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 88 (App. 2012).
Norton v. Phonejockey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Norton v. Phonejockey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 82 (App. 2012).
Scottsdale v. Fortiff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Scottsdale v. Fortiff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., n.50, ¶ 105 (App. 2012) ().
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 89, (reviewing a trial court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion); ¶ 5, (reviewing for an abuse of discretion a trial court’s decision to grant a new trial based on the court’s finding
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 106 (App. 2012).
Young v. Orange Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Young v. Orange Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 53 (App. 2012) (To obtain relief from judgment, movant “must demonstrate the existence of a prima facie defense to the entry of that judgment.”).
Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Murray v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona .... 366 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Holdings, L.L.C., (trial judge has “unique opportunity to hear the testimony and argument, observe its effect on the jury, and determine through his observations that the trial had been unfairly compromised; in contrast, we have only a cold record, which does not convey voice emphasis or inflection, o
Hiatt v. Shah 364 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hiatt v. Shah 364 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 106 (App. 2012).
Marsh v. Mayer 361 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Marsh v. Mayer 361 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 107, ( ).
State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 88 (App. 2012) (same); Clifton, 134 Ariz. at 349 (same).
KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLC 341 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLC 341 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rose Goodyear Properties, LLC v. NBA Enterprises Ltd. Partnership 332 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rose Goodyear Properties, LLC v. NBA Enterprises Ltd. Partnership 332 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Holdings, L.L.C., , 393 ¶ 51