Cited by

¶21 We review a superior court’s attribution of income de novo, ¶ 9 (App. 2009), but review child support awards for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9 (App. 2023).

A court abuses its discretion if, “in reaching its decision, it applies an erroneous rule of law.” ¶ 10 (App. 2009).

¶13 We will not overturn a decision to grant a motion for a new trial absent a “clear abuse of discretion.” ¶ 10 (App. 2009); ¶ 21 (App. 2019) (“We generally review the grant of a new trial more liberally than an order denying one.”).

3 ANDALORO v. ANDALORO Decision of the Court maintenance); ¶ 9 (App. 2009) (attribution of income).

-98, ¶¶ 15, 18 (App. 2009).

¶ 26 (App. 2009); ¶ 6 (1999).

Whether the court can attribute a higher income than the party earns is a question of law reviewed de novo, ¶ 9 (App. 2009), but we review factual findings for clear error, ¶ 6 (App. 2010).

“The trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to grant or deny a motion for a new trial, and we will not overturn that decision absent a clear abuse of discretion.” ¶ 10 (App. 2009) (citations and quotations omitted).

¶10 -98, ¶¶ 15- 18 (App. 2009), to determine whether to include income from his second job for purposes of spousal maintenance.