Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos, 250 P.3d 201.

27 citing documents.

WILLIAMSFIELD/HIGLEY v. STREN Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 13 n.5 (App. 2011) (stating this Court may consider arguments first raised on appeal when "the facts are fully developed, undisputed, and the issue can be resolved as a matter of law").
Matthew Abraham ph.D. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Matthew Abraham ph.D. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
n.5 (App. 2011); see also Logan B. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶¶ 9-11 (App. 2018) (not applying waiver where issue is purely legal).
State v. Burress Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Burress Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 18 (App. 2011) (explaining that the State’s failure to object may result in waiver).
Hill v. El Mirage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Hill v. El Mirage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stelljes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shacknai v. Shacknai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Shacknai v. Shacknai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-30, ¶ 21, -07 (App. 2011) (“[A]ny litigant .
State v. Parsons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Parsons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 14, Ochoa, 224 Ariz. at 217, ¶ 9, 228 P.3d at 953.
State of Arizona v. Ronnie Roy Vera 334 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Ronnie Roy Vera 334 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-07 (App. 2011), citing Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 919
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State ex rel. Horne v. Anthony 303 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State ex rel. Horne v. Anthony 303 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 24 , in which the court found that, after waiting three years to object to the party’s failure to file a claim, the State had waived its right to raise the issue.
City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting Project Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting Project Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Kimicata v. McGee 279 P.3d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Kimicata v. McGee 279 P.3d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
*8 ¶ 21 , (citing cases) (party may waive right to object to adverse party’s failure to comply with statutory, constitutional, and procedural requirements).
The Salvation Army Kelley v. Bennett 273 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
The Salvation Army Kelley v. Bennett 273 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
n.5, n.5 (App. 2011) (identifying factors relevant to consideration, on direct appeal, of issue first raised in motion for reconsideration).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by