Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, 226 P.3d 1046.

130 citing documents.

Edmonds v. Lsref2 Cobalt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
& Const., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 13 (App. 2010) (explaining that “a Rule 12(b)(6) motion that presents a document that is a matter of public record need not be treated as a motion for summary judgment.”).
Marceaux v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 11 (App. 2010).
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 14 (App. 2010), such as the Policy.
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, -64 ¶¶ 8, 13 (App. 2010).
Ogden v. Disys Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ogden v. Disys Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, -64, ¶¶ 10, 13-14 (App. 2010).
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC , , 64, ¶ 14, , 1050 (App. 2010) (holding that it is appropriate under Rule 12(b)(6) to consider a "document that is central to the complaint" but was not appended to the complaint).
Legacy Education v. Asbcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Legacy Education v. Asbcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, -64, ¶¶ 10, 13 (App. 2010))).
Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Antseliovich v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, –64, ¶¶ 10, 13–14 (App. 2010).
Levine v. Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & Mcanally, P. L.C. 418 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Levine v. Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & Mcanally, P. L.C. 418 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, L.L.C. , , 64, ¶ 14, , 1050 (App. 2010) (citing Alt.
Pearce v. Yuma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Delprete v. Ditech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Pearce v. Yuma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 1 (App. 2010) (stating that if a court does not exclude matters outside the pleadings, a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss must be treated “as a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment and [the court must] allow the plaintiff a ‘reasonable opportunity to present’ all pertinent material in response”) with Brosie v. St
Delprete v. Ditech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶¶ 14-15 (App. 2010).
Ornstein v. Bank of America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ornstein v. Bank of America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶¶ 13–14 (App. 2010).
Simpson v. Bell Plaza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Simpson v. Bell Plaza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 13 (App. 2010) (noting “a Rule 12(b)(6) motion that presents a document that is a matter of public record need not be treated as a motion for summary judgment.”).
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Pacific Financial Ass'n 388 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (citation and quotation omitted).
Mirchandani v. Bmo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mirchandani v. Bmo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 10, 64, ¶ 13 (App. 2010) (citations omitted).
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
¶13 Verde also argues this case falls under a third exception identified in Strategic Development and Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶¶ 10, 13-14, -50 (App. 2010).
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, L.L.C., ¶¶ 10, 13-14 (App. 2010)).
Woolbright v. Prince Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Woolbright v. Prince Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010) ().
Pedco v. Under the Tent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pedco v. Under the Tent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, – 62, ¶ 1, –48 (App. 2010).
Simmons v. ferrantelli/west Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Simmons v. ferrantelli/west Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, –64, ¶¶ 8, 13, –50 (App. 2010).
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, n.7, ¶ 17, n.7 (App. 2010).
Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
& Const., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC., -64, ¶¶ 10, 13, - 50 (App. 2010).
Az Eufora v. Constantine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Az Eufora v. Constantine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
and Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, ¶ 10
Biel v. Crg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Biel v. Crg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
& Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, L.L.C., ¶ 13
Compassionate v. adhs/nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Compassionate v. adhs/nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
& 9 COMPASSIONATE v. ADHS/NELSON Decision of the Court Constr., Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLC, -64, ¶¶ 10-13, –50 (App. 2010).