Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C., 261 P.3d 784.

105 citing documents.

Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, Inc. 279 P.3d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
the only judgment,” and BCI contends “judgment” should be interpreted as “the judgment immediately following trial, not a judgment eventually obtained following an appeal.”2 “Judgment” “‘is commonly understood to mean the act of a court which fixes clearly the rights and liabilities of the respective parties to litigation and determines the controversy at hand.’” Berry v. 352 E. Va., L.L.C.
Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC. 274 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC. 274 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C., ¶ 28
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Berry v. 352 E. Va., L.L.C., -14, ¶ 22 , -89 (App.2011) (citing Schwartz v. Farmers Ins.