Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Guardianship of Sleeth, 244 P.3d 1169.
- REDKEY v. CLARKE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- REDKEY v. CLARKE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Herrera
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 21 (App. 2023); ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
- Lange v. Self Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Lange v. Self
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
To find “good faith,” there must be an “objective determination based on all of the circumstances.” ¶ 30 (App. 2010).
- A.R. v. chambers/lattimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
A.R. v. chambers/lattimer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the superior court’s denial of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 12 (App. 2010), and will affirm the decision if reasonable, Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Soc’y, ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).
- Kingston v. Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Kingston v. Kingston
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
4 KINGSTON v. KINGSTON, et al. Decision of the Court actual work performed, their substantial experience in this area of law, and their success for their clients in compliance with the fee request requirements of Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., and
- Greenberg v. McGowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Greenberg v. McGowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Whiles v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Whiles v. Jones
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Sleeth v. Sleeth (In re Guardianship of Sleeth), ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (citing Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Soc’y, ¶ 18 (App. 2004)).
- Fieber v. Weisner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Fieber v. Weisner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶7 In a probate litigation, “we review an award of attorney’s fees and costs for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).
- Sonoran v. Bank of the West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Sonoran v. Bank of the West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Gardner v. First International Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Gardner v. First International Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Kurowski v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Kurowski v. Gorman
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kurowski asserts that such express findings are required under
- Granville v. Howard 335 P.3d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Granville v. Howard
335 P.3d 551
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 12-341.01); ¶¶ 16-18 , (discussing fee awards in probate proceedings).
- Sun Valley Group, Inc. v. Mallet 308 P.3d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Sun Valley Group, Inc. v. Mallet
308 P.3d 1180
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Id.; -76, ¶¶ 15-20 , -74 (App.2010); Nat’l Probate Court Standards 3.1.4 & cmt., “Attorneys’ and Fiduciaries’ Compensation” (listing similar factors); Ariz. Code of Jud.