Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Insurance, 256 P.3d 635.

32 citing documents.

Kimminau Law Firm, P.C. v. Melody Hoopes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Co., (“[O]nce an appellate court has decided a legal issue, that decision is the law of that case in subsequent superior court proceedings and the decision will not be reconsidered in a second appeal, provided the facts, issues and evidence are substantially the same.
State of Arizona v. Dave Allen Laporte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Abriani v. Slaughter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Abriani v. Slaughter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Freer v. Cliftonlarsonallen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Freer v. Cliftonlarsonallen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Neary v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Neary v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Citibank v. Lambert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Citibank v. Lambert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ashkenazi v. Baldino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ashkenazi v. Baldino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yf Group v. Farmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Yf Group v. Farmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Span v. Maricopa 437 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Span v. Maricopa 437 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Chasan v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Chasan v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., –43, ¶ 12 (App. 2011).
Alcombrack v. Ciccarelli 363 P.3d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Alcombrack v. Ciccarelli 363 P.3d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Schoenberg v. Rm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Schoenberg v. Rm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Citibank v. Barrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Citibank v. Barrett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title Insurance 310 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title Insurance 310 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., ¶ 17 , (that trial court initially, but erroneously, agreed with proponent’s interpretation of a contract does not necessarily prove absence of bad faith).
Sholes v. Fernando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sholes v. Fernando 268 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sholes v. Fernando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Co., quoting Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Indus.
Sholes v. Fernando 268 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Co., , quoting Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Indus.