Cited by

56 citing documents.

Welz v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Welz v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
P. 60(c)(6); Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass’n v. Orlandini, ¶ 42
Pima County Human Rights Committee v. Arizona Department of Health Services 303 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Pima County Human Rights Committee v. Arizona Department of Health Services 303 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
¶14 We must interpret statutes “in light of the entire statutory scheme ‘so they may be harmonious and consistent.’” Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass’n v. Orlandini
Reynolds v. Reynolds 294 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reynolds v. Reynolds 294 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
5 All three elements must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence and “the absence of even one element render[s] the statute inapplicable.” Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass’n v. Orlandini, ¶ 49 , , 1181 (App.2011) (citation omitted).