Cited by

¶ 8 (App. 2011)); see also State ex rel.

¶7 Generally, “we will dismiss an appeal as moot when our action as a reviewing court will have no effect on the parties.” ¶ 5 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2011)).

3 –94, ¶ 8 (App. 2011) (stating a decision is moot if the court’s decision would have no effect on the parties).

–94, ¶ 8 (App. 2011) (quoting Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., ).

¶ 11 (App. 2011) ( ¶ 4 (App. 2002)).

¶ 8 (App. 2011) (quoting Phx.

¶ 8 (App. 2011) (citation omitted)).

¶ 6 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2011)).

¶ 8, ) (internal quotations omitted), we find neither of these exceptions applicable here.

¶ 8, ) (internal quotations omitted), we find neither of these exceptions applicable here.

-94, ¶ 8, -40 (App. 2011) (“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where, as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” (citations omitted)).

However, we may elect to consider issues that have become moot “‘if there is either an issue of great public importance or an issue capable of repetition yet evading review.’” quoting Phoenix Newspapers