DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nolan v. Kenner, 250 P.3d 236.

26 citing documents.

  • Gounder v. Royal Riviera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Gounder v. Royal Riviera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    § 12-1512(A); ¶ 5 (App. 2011) (“The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds.”).
  • Shastri v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Shastri v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶12 “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds.” ¶ 5 (App. 2011).
  • Anderson v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Anderson v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    ¶ 4 (App. 2011) (confirming an arbitration award); Hanson v. Com.
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • McGill v. Ball Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • McGill v. Ball Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    v. O’Donnell, ¶ 23 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 5 (App. 2011) (“The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds .
  • Mills and Woods v. Weiss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Mills and Woods v. Weiss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    As Nesco acknowledges, “[t]he superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds.” ¶ 5 (App. 2011).
  • Mellcell v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Mellcell v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶14 “A court may refuse to confirm an arbitration award because of undue means only when the undue means are (1) not discoverable upon the exercise of due diligence prior to the arbitration, (2) materially related to an issue in the arbitration, and (3) established by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 7 (App. 2011) (cleaned up).
  • Richert v. Buck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Richert v. Buck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Judicial review of arbitration awards is severely restricted.” ¶ 4, (internal citations omitted).
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-3023(A)(1), (4) (Supp. 2014) provides that, among other reasons, an arbitration award shall be vacated if “[t]he award was procured by corruption, fraud or other undue means,” or if “[a]n arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator’s powers.” “The superior court may reject an arbitration award only on narrow statutorily enumerated grounds....” ¶ 5
  • Roberts v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Roberts v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Greer v. Delgrolice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Greer v. Delgrolice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶ 13, (citation omitted); Smitty’s Super-Valu, -81, (citations omitted).