Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Awsienko v. Cohen, 257 P.3d 175.

28 citing documents.

Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See id.; ¶ 13 (App. 2011) (“[T]he legislature sought to ensure that physicians testifying as experts have sufficient expertise to truly assist the fact-finder on issues of standard of care and proximate causation.”).
Schuler v. Sharma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Schuler v. Sharma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lampe v. Lampe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lampe v. Lampe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fellers v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fellers v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
rasor/miller v. Northwest Hospital LLC Ariz. 2017
rasor/miller v. Northwest Hospital LLC Ariz. 2017
at ¶ 32, 169 ¶ 37; ¶ 22 n. 5 (App. 2011) (affirming summary judgment based on deficient expert qualifications when no challenge pursuant to § 12-2603(F) was made to expert affidavit).
Ribitzki v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ribitzki v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lehman v. Fussell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lehman v. Fussell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Clemens v. Dmb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Clemens v. Dmb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 7, It is unclear why the superior court chose to summarily dismiss the claims against DMB rather than consider the merits of DMB’s summary judgment motion.
Preston v. Amadei 357 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Preston v. Amadei 357 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kahn v. Arizona Medical Board 300 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Kahn v. Arizona Medical Board 300 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
“[T]he legislature intended that § 12-2604(A) ‘ensure that physicians testifying as experts have sufficient expertise to truly assist the fact-finder on issues of standard of care and proximate causation.’” ¶ 9 , ( ¶ 13 , ).
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
Criticized Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
260 ¶¶ 9, 17-18, 179 (App. 2011).
Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. Blackburn 290 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. Blackburn 290 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
When a special action raises purely legal questions, which we review de novo, 6 (App. 2011), it is particularly appropriate for us to accept jurisdiction, Sierra Tucson
Mikel Lo, M.D. and Mikel W. Lo, M.d, Inc. v. Mills 298 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Mikel Lo, M.D. and Mikel W. Lo, M.d, Inc. v. Mills 298 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
“Arizona law requires a plaintiff who asserts a medical negligence claim against a health care professional to prove that the health care professional failed to comply with the applicable standard of care.” citing A.R.S.
Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of Regents 269 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of Regents 269 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶ 5 When interpreting a statute, our goal is “ ‘to fulfill the intent of the legislature that wrote it.’”