DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Williamson v. PVORBIT, INC., 263 P.3d 77.

47 citing documents.

  • MARKHAM v. CAHAVA Ariz. 2026
    See Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶¶ 27–28 (App. 2011); see also A M Leasing, (describing Flooring Systems as “typical of those cases in which the defendant, while retaining a benefit conferred by the plaintiff with expectation of payment, pays no one or renders only partial payment”).
  • High Stakes v. Garver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • High Stakes v. Garver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    P. 56(a); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Ortiz v. Rambo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Ortiz v. Rambo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    P. 56(a); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Village at Oakcreek v. Bonham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Village at Oakcreek v. Bonham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 16 (App. 2011) (trustees entitled to benefits and protections of property ownership).1 ¶11 The Association next urges the Amendments were foreseeable to Bonham, hovering over section 4.03 of the original Declaration, which prohibits operating a business on the property: 4.03.
  • Tempe v. Graystar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Tempe v. Graystar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    P. 56(a); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    P. 56(a); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • State v. Tunkey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Tunkey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Seidman v. Weiler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Seidman v. Weiler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Lane v. Gavilan Peak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Lane v. Gavilan Peak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (alteration in original) (quoting Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 20, n.1 (App. 2011)); see also Restatement § 12(1).
  • Holcomb v. American Valet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Holcomb v. American Valet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Seronde v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Seronde v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Malhotra v. Malhotra 377 P.3d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Malhotra v. Malhotra 377 P.3d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 16 (App. 2011) (“In a trust, the trustees hold legal title and the beneficiaries hold equitable title.”) ( (emphasis in original)).
  • Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Verduzco v. American Valet 377 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Whether a person has “reason to know” something is a fact question and the element is proven if a reasonable person would “either infer the existence of the fact in question or would regard its existence as so highly probable that his [or her] conduct would be predicated upon the assumption that the fact did exist.” Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., , 73 n. 1 ¶ 20, , 81 n. 1 (App. 2011) (citation omitted); see also Coventry Homes, Inc. v. Scottscom P’ship, , (quoting Restatement Second § 12 (“Reason
  • masci/mcalister v. Masci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • masci/mcalister v. Masci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • City of Scottsdale v. State 352 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • City of Scottsdale v. State 352 P.3d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    P. 56(a); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11
  • Valencia v. Bp Capital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Valencia v. Bp Capital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “We will affirm summary judgment only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party seeking judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Northstar v. Collingwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Northstar v. Collingwood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “We will affirm summary judgment only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party seeking judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011) (citations omitted).
  • Sorrell v. Gaarde-Morton 357 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Sorrell v. Gaarde-Morton 357 P.3d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 17 , see A.R.S.
  • Langendorf v. Buckeye Water Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Langendorf v. Buckeye Water Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); Warrington by 2 LANGENDORF v. BUCKEYE WATER Decision of the Court Warrington v. Tempe Elementary Sch.
  • Seronde v. bnsf/morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Seronde v. bnsf/morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
  • Marco Crane & Rigging Co. v. Masaryk 341 P.3d 490 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Marco Crane & Rigging Co. v. Masaryk 341 P.3d 490 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    § 33–1002(A)(2); Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶ 13
  • Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. 324 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, and will affirm “only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party seeking judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc.
  • Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    Flooring Sys., Inc. v. Radisson Grp., Inc., , Williamson v. PVOrbit, Inc., ¶¶ 27-28 , Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Constr.