Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028.

40 citing documents.

Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Pineda v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Pineda v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Crosby v. Mesa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Crosby v. Mesa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, LLC, ¶ 42 (App. 2012) (one party’s attempt to enforce an incorrect interpretation of a contract is not enough to establish a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing).
Flaum v. Hoernig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Flaum v. Hoernig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012)
Professional Choice v. Appel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Professional Choice v. Appel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Agricann v. Natural Remedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Clementine v. Ruhorimbere Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Clementine v. Ruhorimbere Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
2002–A v. Ariz. Mills, LLC, ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Le Canard v. Thorpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Le Canard v. Thorpe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
2002–A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
State v. Series Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Series Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Zaki v. Capstone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Zaki v. Capstone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 41 (App. 2012).
E&M Services v. A&N Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
E&M Services v. A&N Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“We view the evidence and reasonable inferences from that evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.” FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Dabrowski v. Bartlett 442 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dabrowski v. Bartlett 442 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012)
Spanish Hills v. Wollner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Followed Spanish Hills v. Wollner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Nielson v. Starr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nielson v. Starr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012).
Adams v. Giguere Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Adams v. Giguere Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 34 (App. 2012) (“The fact finder is the sole judge of the facts and the credibility of the witnesses.”) ( ¶¶ 23-24 (App. 2011)).
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 34 (App. 2012) (“The fact finder is the sole judge of the facts and the credibility of the witnesses.”) ( ¶¶ 23-24 (App. 2011)).
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
2002- A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 41 (App. 2012).
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Followed Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (holding that we are bound by the court’s finding of fact unless clearly erroneous).
monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 24
Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The implied covenant requires both parties to “refrain from acting in a manner that would impair the right of the other to receive the benefits of their agreement.” FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Ariz. Mills, L.L.C., ¶ 41

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by