Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., 293 P.3d 520.

80 citing documents.

Arpaio v. Hines Gs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Arpaio v. Hines Gs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 20 (App. 2013).
Gonzalez v. Mat Const Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gonzalez v. Mat Const Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶10 A plaintiff alleging negligence must show: “(1) a duty requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of care; (2) the defendant’s breach of that duty; (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual damages.” McMurty v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
Proctor v. Pvusd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Proctor v. Pvusd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 23 (App. 2013).
Francis v. Purk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Francis v. Purk Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22, (citing Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 355, 706 P.2d at 367); (holding that a landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of tenants and others).
Moore v. Parham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Moore v. Parham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 22, (citing Markowitz, 146 Ariz. at 355, 706 P.2d at 367); (holding that a landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of tenants and others).3 claims against all parties had been r
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., -52, ¶¶ 16-18, -28 (App. 2013) (holding that a witness qualified as an expert based on his experience).
Martin v. Royal Sign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Martin v. Royal Sign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In deciding whether to allow an adverse inference, the court considers whether the destruction of evidence was intentional or in bad faith “and whether the loss of evidence prejudiced the party seeking sanctions.” McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 51 (App. 2013).
Preston v. Amadei 357 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Preston v. Amadei 357 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Sandretto, 234 Ariz. at 357, ¶ 14; ¶ 15 (App. 2013) (holding a medical expert may rely on his medical experience, including “self-reported patient histories,” and “the possibility of inaccuracies [with respect to patient histories] may be explored on cross-examination”); McMurty v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2013) (explaining Rule 702 does not preclude the testimony of experience-based experts; cross- examination allows the opposing party to question the reliability and general
Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., –52, ¶¶ 15–18, –28 (App. 2013) (expert may be qualified based on experience).
Nesbitt v. Radisson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Nesbitt v. Radisson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., –53, ¶ 23, –29 (App. 2013).
Glazer v. State 321 P.3d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Glazer v. State 321 P.3d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
This court “review[s] de novo matters involving interpretation of court rules,” ¶ 10, and reviews a fact-based “decision to permit or exclude expert testimony for an abuse of discretion,” McMurty v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 10
Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc. 322 P.3d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc. 322 P.3d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
702 cmt.; see also McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.
State v. Bernstein 317 P.3d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Bernstein 317 P.3d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 10 This court “review[s] de novo matters involving interpretation of court rules,” ¶ 10 , and a fact-based “decision to permit or exclude expert testimony for an abuse of discretion,” McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc., ¶ 10
State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-Bianca 312 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
4, ¶ 18, quoting McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.