Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bys Inc. v. Smoudi, 269 P.3d 1197.

34 citing documents.

Mladick v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mladick v. Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Williams v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Williams v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 8 (2018); ¶ 14 (App. 2012).
Lomeli v. Velasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Lomeli v. Velasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
4qtkidz LLC v. Hnt Holdings llc/beth Ford 513 P.3d 1106 Ariz. 2022
4qtkidz LLC v. Hnt Holdings llc/beth Ford 513 P.3d 1106 Ariz. 2022
¶ 8 (2016); ¶ 18 (App. 2012).
Melendez v. Melancon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Melendez v. Melancon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Jorge Othon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Jorge Othon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
Imh v. Maniatis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Imh v. Maniatis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jp Morgan v. Adams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jp Morgan v. Adams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aea Federal v. Yuma Funding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aea Federal v. Yuma Funding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We review the court’s ruling on a Rule 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 35 (App. 2017), but whether an order is void is reviewed de novo, ¶ 18 (App. 2012).
Cuen v. Cuen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cuen v. Cuen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We generally review the denial of a motion under Rule 60 for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 15 (App. 2010), but we "review de novo whether a default judgment is void and should be vacated pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4)," ¶ 18 (App. 2012) (as amended).
Wells Fargo v. Safe Wing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wells Fargo v. Safe Wing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ruffino v. Lokosky 425 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ruffino v. Lokosky 425 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Exam'rs , , 143, , 1372 (1995) ); see also BYS Inc. v. Smoudi , , 577, ¶ 14, , 1201 (App. 2012) ; however, proper service under the rule is a legal question of personal jurisdiction which we review de novo , see Duckstein v. Wolf , , 233, ¶ 19, , 434 (App. 2012) (citing cases); Ezell , 224 Ariz. at 536 , ¶ 15 , 233 P.3d at 649 .
Roundtable v. Schmedding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Roundtable v. Schmedding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-78, ¶¶ 14, 18 (App. 2012).
Canyon v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Canyon v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 14 (App. 2012), as amended (Mar.
Advanced v. Gladden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Advanced v. Gladden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 20, (“Once a defendant has appeared, a default judgment can be obtained only after a hearing by the court upon three days’ written notice.”).
Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLC 293 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLC 293 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012