Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rinegar v. Rinegar, 290 P.3d 1208.

54 citing documents.

  • Gutierrez v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gutierrez v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    The superior court may maintain separate departments for different kinds of cases, but such administrative organization does not partition the court’s general subject matter jurisdiction.” ¶ 13, (quotation and citations omitted).
  • Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    nsion benefits are community property subject to equitable division if acquired during the marriage); Boncoskey, 216 Ariz. at 451-52, ¶ 16, 167 P.3d at 708- 5 NATALE v. NATALE Decision of the Court 09 (confirming that Johnson should be applied to non-mature pensions); ¶21, (explaining that the trial court has jurisdiction to equitably divide non-qualified pension plans acquired during the marriage).