Cited by

And “[w]e view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s ruling.” ¶ 46 (App. 2012).

DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review and Applicable Law ¶13 On appeal from a bench trial, we view the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s ruling, ¶ 46 (App. 2012), and will affirm the judgment if correct for any reason, FL Receivables Tr.

v. Figueroa, ¶ 9 (App. 2009); ¶ 46 (App. 2012).

See, e.g., Taylor, 175 Ariz. at 152-55

¶ 30 (App. 2012) (A minimally raised argument in a footnote of a supplemental memorandum preserved an issue for appeal.).

¶19 On appeal from a bench trial, we view the “evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior 6 AGRICANN v. NATURAL REMEDY Decision of the Court court’s ruling,” ¶ 46 (App. 2012), and we will affirm the court’s judgment if it is correct for any reason, FL Receivables Tr.

¶ 46 (App. 2012); Ariz. R. Civ.

3 HUMPHREY, ¶ 21 (App. 2012).

view[ing] the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s ruling.” ¶ 46 (App. 2012).

P. 52(a)(6), while reviewing conclusions of law de novo, ¶ 46 (App. 2012).