Cited by

¶ 8 (App. 2013) (“Our jurisdiction is defined by statute, and we must dismiss an appeal over which we lack jurisdiction.”).

§§ 12-120.21, 12-2101; (appellate jurisdiction “is defined by statute”).

4 LACOUR v. LACOUR Decision of the Court the premature notice of appeal would be “ineffective” and a “nullity.” ¶ 18 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).

¶11 Our jurisdiction is established by statute and is generally “limited to appeals from final judgments which dispose of all claims and parties.” Madrid v. Avalon Care Ctr.-Chandler, L.L.C., (); see also A.R.S.

§§ 12–2101, –120.21; ¶ 8 (App. 2013).

–79, ¶ 8 (App. 2013) (this court must independently examine its jurisdiction in every appeal and cannot act if it lacks jurisdiction).

-83, ¶¶ 9-16 (App. 2015); ¶ 19 (App. 2013).

See Baker v. Bradley , , ¶ 8

§ 12-2101(A)(1) (2016); ¶ 9, (court of appeals jurisdiction “limited to 1The Honorable Patricia K. Norris, Retired Judge of the Court of Appeals, Division One, has been authorized to sit in this matter pursuant to Article VI, Section 3 of the Arizona Constitution.

See, ¶ 8 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2013)).

¶7 “Generally, this court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals from final judgments which dispose of all claims and parties.”

-79, ¶ 8, -15 (App. 2013).

See, ¶ 8 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2013)).

¶ 18, (explaining cases dismissing appeals for lack of jurisdiction because notices of appeal are premature share the common characteristic that they involve pending motions for substantive relief or require a discretionary judicial determination after the notice is filed).

Craig, 227 Ariz. at 107, ¶ 13; ¶ 19 (App. 2013).

-79, ¶ 8, -15 (App. 2013).

See McHazlett v. Otis Eng’g Corp., –82 ¶¶ 21–23, –18 (App. 2013).