Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Nold v. Nold, 304 P.3d 1093.
-
Mayol v. Rowlls
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 10 (App. 2013) (citing Hays, 205 Ariz. at 102, ¶ 18).
- Baker v. Meyer 346 P.3d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- Baker v. Meyer 346 P.3d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- Michael v. Michael Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Michael v. Michael Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C. 343 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C.
343 P.3d 457
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
(“[I]f the best interests of the child trump the consequences ordinarily imposed for violations of the rules, then they should not be ignored under the discretionary doctrine of waiver.”).
- Iuliano v. Wloch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Iuliano v. Wloch
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The best interests of the child are for the family court alone to decide.” ¶ 14, (internal citation and quotations omitted).
- Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Atkinson v. McIndoo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶34 “[W]e will not disturb the [superior] court’s custody or parenting time orders on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 11
- Manola v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Manola v. Espinoza
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
DISCUSSION ¶10 We will not disturb the trial court’s custody or parenting time orders on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 11
- Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Stevens v. Yohannes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
4 STEVENS v. YOHANNES Decision of the Court 16-20, 213 P.3d at 357-59); ¶ 9
- Caskey v. Battani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Caskey v. Battani
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
parenting time orders absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 11, (citation omitted).
- Nachiappan v. Subramanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Nachiappan v. Subramanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Christopher K. v. Markaa S. 311 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Christopher K. v. Markaa S.
311 P.3d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-74, ¶ 14 , -97 (App.2013).