DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michaelson v. Garr, 323 P.3d 1193.

94 citing documents.

  • Robinson v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Robinson v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Gutierrez v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gutierrez v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 4 n.3 (App. 2014) (noting that this Court may, but is not required, to treat the failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error).
  • Williams v. Jiminez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Williams v. Jiminez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    “The court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (quotation omitted).
  • Aldana v. Aldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Aldana v. Aldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Priddy v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Priddy v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “The court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 14 (App. 2012)).
  • Harter v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Harter v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Delacruz v. Neriz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Delacruz v. Neriz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    We will not reverse unless the record, “viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
  • Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Lopez v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Lite v. Lite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Lite v. Lite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (affirming an order of protection for harassment via electronic means).
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    “The court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (internal quotations and citation omitted).
  • Halloum v. Hasasneh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Halloum v. Hasasneh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Shah v. Vakharwala 418 P.3d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Shah v. Vakharwala 418 P.3d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Thomas v. Njie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Thomas v. Njie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Mustonen’s Estate, 130 Ariz. at 284 (); ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Fuller v. Fuller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Fuller v. Fuller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    n.3, ¶ 4, n.3 (App. 2014).
  • Kroon v. Kroon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kroon v. Kroon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    (court abuses discretion when record devoid of competent evidence supporting decision).
  • Johnston v. Johnston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Johnston v. Johnston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    3 JOHNSTON v. JOHNSTON Decision of the Court (App. 1993).2 “The court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
  • Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    We view the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision and will not overturn the trial court unless the ruling “is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5, (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary 3 SHURTS v. SHURTS Decision of the Court conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 5
  • Morrison v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Morrison v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    n.3, n.3 (App. 2014) 2 MORRISON v. BENNETT Decision of the Court hearing in the record on appeal.4 We, as a result, do not know what happened at the hearing other than the information in any minute en