Cited by

¶ 10 (App. 2014); ¶ 13 (App. 2001).

¶ 22 (App. 2014) (Evidence is cumulative if it is more evidence of the same character and supports a fact already established by other evidence.).

¶ 10 (App. 2014); ¶ 13 (App. 2001).

¶18 The court of appeals addressed the term “independent expert” in 2014 ¶ 19 (App. 2014).

The same standard applies to the superior court’s determination of the admissibility of expert testimony, ¶ 10 (App. 2014), and the denial of a motion for change of judge for cause.

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

Corp., ¶ 31 (App. 2014).

¶ 31 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 6 (App. 2007); ¶ 10 (App. 2014).

¶ 10 (App. 2014); ¶ 6 (App. 2004); ¶ 8 (App. 2012) ("We review challenges to the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction and questions involving the application and interpretation of court rules de novo.").

We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” ¶ 31 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 12 (2003)).

The complaint further alleged that because of Dixon’s improper service,2 a default judgment was 1 “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, ‘viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.’” ¶ 31 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 12 (2003)).