Cited by

–97, ¶¶ 1920 (App. 2017).

“The pretrial statement controls the subsequent course of the litigation and is intended to avoid unfair surprise at trial.” ¶ 28 (App. 2017) (cleaned up).

¶ 19 (App. 2017) (A spouse’s payments toward community debt must be accounted for in an equitable property distribution.).

(–62 (App. 1980)); ¶ 19 (App. 2017) (an equitable property distribution must account for voluntary payments a spouse makes toward community debts to maintain community assets after the filing of a dissolution petition).

¶ 19 (App. 2017), he is entitled to be reimbursed for these payments, and the court abused its discretion in denying his claim for reimbursement.

The purpose of a pretrial statement is “to avoid unfair surprise at trial.” ¶ 28 (App. 2017).

-97, ¶¶ 11, 20 (App. 2017).

¶ 10 (App. 2017), Father should be reimbursed for his payment of the various community expenses from a portion of Mother’s equity in the parties’ home.

¶3 and adjust Wife’s equalization payment obligation.

“The superior court, in its discretion, role, and experience, may determine the prevailing party from all the circumstances[.]” ¶ 25 (App. 2017).

7 ¶ 39 (App. 2007), ¶ 1 (App. 2017) (holding pre-marital agreements stipulating to a prevailing-party standard for awarding attorneys’ fees violate public policy per se).

(“[W]e generally will not consider an argument raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial.”); ¶ 29 (App. 2017) (Wife precluded from raising a new claim in her new trial motion.); Helena Chem.

¶26 Father additionally argues that he was entitled to reimbursement for “a vehicle loan payment he made on Mother’s behalf and .

Mgmt., Inc., ¶ 25 (App. 2017); see also Assyia v. State Farm Mut.

¶ 31 (App. 2017) (finding A.R.S.

¶ 23 (App. 2017) (arguments not raised below are waived).