Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite RS Industries, Inc. v. Candrian, 377 P.3d 329.
- Rounding v. Bos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
Rounding v. Bos
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
- Shastri v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Shastri v. Patel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
- Holaday v. Foremost Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Holaday v. Foremost
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶15 “We review the superior court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in the light most favorable to upholding the decision and will affirm unless the superior court abused its discretion.” RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016); Hanson v. Com.
- Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Moldovan v. Long
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (“Although the better practice may be to avoid block-billing when it can be done reasonably, .
- Starr Pass Resort Developments, LLC v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- Starr Pass Resort Developments, LLC v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Martinez v. Blake
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶26 “By statute, a successful party to a civil action in Arizona is entitled to recover ‘from his adversary all costs expended or incurred therein unless otherwise provided by law.’” RS Indus., ¶ 15 (App. 2016) (quoting A.R.S.
- Pravati v. Randolph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Pravati v. Randolph
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
But Defendants “made and lost the same arguments in the arbitration proceeding,” The Spaulding LLC, 250 Ariz. at 387, ¶ 15, and this court cannot reconsider them on appeal, see RS Indus., ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
- Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Zahler v. Swift Transportation
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
- McGill v. Ball Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
McGill v. Ball
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016) (citing Atreus Cmtys.
- McKee v. Lamore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
McKee v. Lamore
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Other expenses, including those incurred for photocopying, facsimiles, shipping and travel expenses, are not recoverable as taxable costs.” RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016).
- Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLC 492 P.3d 1031 Ariz. 2021
-
Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLC
492 P.3d 1031
Ariz. 2021
See RS Indus., ¶ 14 (App. 2016); A.R.S.
- Yanez v. Kundavaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Yanez v. Kundavaram
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
And in all other claims, “the fees [a litigant] pays its own expert witness are not recoverable.” RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016).
- Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Tms v. Zachariah
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016) (denying recovery of expenses incurred for “photocopying, facsimiles, shipping and travel expenses”); Newman v. Select Specialty Hosp.-Ariz., Inc., ¶ 42 (App. 2016) (denying recovery for “faxes, copies and postage,” “expert witness fees and travel expenses,” and “other amount
- Singh Roofing v. Shadowood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Singh Roofing v. Shadowood
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION ¶15 “[J]udicial review of an arbitration award is substantially limited by statute.” RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
- Rychlik v. Sodergren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Rychlik v. Sodergren
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (finding that though it may be better practice to avoid block-billing, “no Arizona authority holds that a court abuses its discretion by awarding fees that have been block-billed”); see also Schweiger, 138 Ariz. at 188 (finding that there is sufficient detail in a billing report if counsel indic
- Fieber v. Weisner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Fieber v. Weisner
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We will affirm the award “if there is a reasonable basis for doing so.” RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
- Riedel v. Fuentes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Riedel v. Fuentes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) ("Although the better practice may be to avoid block-billing when it can be done reasonably .
- Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Black Creek v. Alanco
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
- Jordan v. Hubbard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Jordan v. Hubbard
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
- Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“We review the superior court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in the light most favorable to upholding the decision and will affirm unless the superior court abused its discretion.” RS Industries, ¶ 7