Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite RS Industries, Inc. v. Candrian, 377 P.3d 329.

40 citing documents.

  • Rounding v. Bos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Rounding v. Bos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
  • Shastri v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Shastri v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
  • Holaday v. Foremost Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Holaday v. Foremost Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    ¶15 “We review the superior court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in the light most favorable to upholding the decision and will affirm unless the superior court abused its discretion.” RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016); Hanson v. Com.
  • Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Moldovan v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (“Although the better practice may be to avoid block-billing when it can be done reasonably, .
  • Starr Pass Resort Developments, LLC v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
  • Starr Pass Resort Developments, LLC v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
  • Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    ¶26 “By statute, a successful party to a civil action in Arizona is entitled to recover ‘from his adversary all costs expended or incurred therein unless otherwise provided by law.’” RS Indus., ¶ 15 (App. 2016) (quoting A.R.S.
  • Pravati v. Randolph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Pravati v. Randolph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    But Defendants “made and lost the same arguments in the arbitration proceeding,” The Spaulding LLC, 250 Ariz. at 387, ¶ 15, and this court cannot reconsider them on appeal, see RS Indus., ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Zahler v. Swift Transportation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
  • McGill v. Ball Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • McGill v. Ball Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016) (citing Atreus Cmtys.
  • McKee v. Lamore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • McKee v. Lamore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    “Other expenses, including those incurred for photocopying, facsimiles, shipping and travel expenses, are not recoverable as taxable costs.” RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016).
  • Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLC 492 P.3d 1031 Ariz. 2021
  • Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLC 492 P.3d 1031 Ariz. 2021
    See RS Indus., ¶ 14 (App. 2016); A.R.S.
  • Yanez v. Kundavaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Yanez v. Kundavaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    And in all other claims, “the fees [a litigant] pays its own expert witness are not recoverable.” RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016).
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See RS Indus., ¶ 16 (App. 2016) (denying recovery of expenses incurred for “photocopying, facsimiles, shipping and travel expenses”); Newman v. Select Specialty Hosp.-Ariz., Inc., ¶ 42 (App. 2016) (denying recovery for “faxes, copies and postage,” “expert witness fees and travel expenses,” and “other amount
  • Singh Roofing v. Shadowood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Singh Roofing v. Shadowood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    DISCUSSION ¶15 “[J]udicial review of an arbitration award is substantially limited by statute.” RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
  • Rychlik v. Sodergren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Rychlik v. Sodergren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) (finding that though it may be better practice to avoid block-billing, “no Arizona authority holds that a court abuses its discretion by awarding fees that have been block-billed”); see also Schweiger, 138 Ariz. at 188 (finding that there is sufficient detail in a billing report if counsel indic
  • Fieber v. Weisner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Fieber v. Weisner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    We will affirm the award “if there is a reasonable basis for doing so.” RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
  • Riedel v. Fuentes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Riedel v. Fuentes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016) ("Although the better practice may be to avoid block-billing when it can be done reasonably .
  • Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    RS Indus., ¶ 21 (App. 2016).
  • Jordan v. Hubbard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Jordan v. Hubbard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    RS Indus., ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
  • Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Phoenix-Tucson v. Deetz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    “We review the superior court’s decision to confirm an arbitration award in the light most favorable to upholding the decision and will affirm unless the superior court abused its discretion.” RS Industries, ¶ 7