DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, 380 P.3d 659.

91 citing documents.

  • State v. Cavness Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶11 “This court’s appellate jurisdiction is defined, and limited, by the Legislature.” Brummett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 4 (App. 2016).
  • McGee v. Syms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • McGee v. Syms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    § 12-2101(A)(1).” Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., 427, ¶¶ 2, 9 (App. 2016).
  • Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶¶ 18–19 (App. 2016).
  • Myers, Jr. v. Freescale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Myers, Jr. v. Freescale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., –28, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).
  • Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Co., ¶ 15 (2009) (absent a showing of prejudice, an order is appealable when it in effect determines the action); ¶ 9 (App. 2018) (recognizing exceptions to the general rule); Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 32 (App. 2016) (citing cases).
  • Wood v. Abril 420 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • Wood v. Abril 420 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    ¶ 11, , 666 (App. 2016).
  • Powell v. Pac. Specialty Ins. Co. 415 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • Powell v. Pac. Specialty Ins. Co. 415 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal under § 12-2101(A)(1) when required Rule 54(c) language is missing, Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., , ¶ 6, , 665 (App. 2016), and, even when a judgment is otherwise final, we may not consider the appeal unless we temporarily revest jurisdiction in the trial court for entry of the missing language, Madrid, , ¶ 5, , 330-31.
  • Magnotta v. Serra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Magnotta v. Serra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 9 (App. 2016) (appeals taken under A.R.S.
  • Allstate v. Watts 418 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Allstate v. Watts 418 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See also Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., -31, ¶¶ 20-21 (App. 2016).
  • City of Tucson v. Sensibar 414 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • City of Tucson v. Sensibar 414 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C. , , ¶ 1
  • Roundtable v. Schmedding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Roundtable v. Schmedding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Appeals are generally only allowed from final judgments, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), but may be pursued from other rulings as authorized in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2101(A), Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 2 (App. 2016).
  • J. Ball Trust v. Phx Orchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • J. Ball Trust v. Phx Orchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 4 (App. 2016).
  • Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. Fuller 398 P.3d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. Fuller 398 P.3d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 4 (App. 2016).
  • Caravetta v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Caravetta v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Co., ¶ 15 (2009) (holding a dismissal without prejudice entered after the statute of limitations has run is a final, appealable order when it “in effect determines the action”) (citations omitted), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 22 (App. 2016); ¶¶ 4-5 (App. 2017).
  • Los Indios v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Los Indios v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 14
  • Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc. 393 P.3d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
  • Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc. 393 P.3d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C.
  • Heritage v. Weinberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Heritage v. Weinberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 5 (App. 2016).
  • Caravetta v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Caravetta v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Co., ¶ 15 (2009) (holding a dismissal without prejudice entered after the statute of limitations has run is a final, appealable order), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 22 (App. 2016); see also Romero v. Hasan, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶¶ 4–5 (App. 2017).
  • Aea Federal v. Yuma Funding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Aea Federal v. Yuma Funding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., ¶ 9, (appeals taken under A.R.S.
  • In Re the Guardianship and Conservatorship Of: Robert Sommer 386 P.3d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • In Re the Guardianship and Conservatorship Of: Robert Sommer 386 P.3d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    ¶11 But appellees cite Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., P.3d 659 (App. 2016), and two other cases interpreting § 12-2101(A)(9), to support their position that the May 11 order is not final, and consequently that we lack jurisdiction.
  • Tucson Lot 4, LLC v. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. 385 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Tucson Lot 4, LLC v. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. 385 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    See Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, L.L.C., 2 Preliminary Injunction ¶4 TL4 contends the trial court erred in granting the preliminary injunction based on a failure of evidence.