Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Sherman v. Sherman, 384 P.3d 324.
- Galvan v. Duarte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Galvan v. Duarte
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
.” –13, ¶ 9 (App. 2016).
- Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Denslow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Denslow
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
For example, ¶ 5 (App. 2016), the father was not voluntarily unemployed; he could not work because of a medical condition.
- Peralta v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Peralta v. Peralta
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
For example, -13, ¶¶ 5, 12 (App. 2016), the father was unable to work because of a medical condition and not voluntarily unemployed.
- Mathis v. Mathis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Mathis v. Mathis
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“We review child support awards for abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2016).
- Carter v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Carter v. Carter
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
However, "'[c]hild support and [spousal] maintenance are considered under different laws,' and awards for both 'involve distinct considerations.'" ¶ 18 n.2 (App. 2018) (alteration in original) ( ¶ 18 n.1 (App. 2016) and Elliott, 165 Ariz. at 137).
- Johnson v. Malone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Johnson v. Malone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Wilson v. Wilson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶7 “Spousal maintenance is not intended to serve ‘as a method of holding open the courtroom door for possible changes of circumstances.’” ¶ 19 (App. 2016) ().
- state/des v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- state/des v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
- Young v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Young v. Young
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 25-319(B); ¶ 17 (App. 2016).
- Birnstihl v. Birnstihl 416 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Birnstihl v. Birnstihl
416 P.3d 852
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sherman v. Sherman , , 112, ¶ 9, , 326-27 (App. 2016) ; Engel v. Landman , , 510, ¶ 21, , 848 (App. 2009).
- Krenz v. Neuman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Krenz v. Neuman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017