Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811.
- McEuen v. Christensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- McEuen v. Christensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Powers v. Hon contes/quinlan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Powers v. Hon contes/quinlan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Perla M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Holt v. Baum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Holt v. Baum
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Nevertheless, for the rulings refusing to enforce the 2016 and 2017 subpoenas, and the corresponding fee awards, “the parties have fully briefed and argued the issues, the superior court has ruled on the claims, and the non-final issues would likely be raised on appeal after a final judgment.” ¶ 15 (App. 2019).
- Jessicah C. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jessicah C. v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Andrich v. Meyers, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Andrich v. Meyers, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019