Cited by

¶ 6 (App. 2019) (citing cases)

¶ 17 (App. 2019); ¶¶ 27–29 (App. 2 Although this is a probate matter, we cite to and analyze the civil rules because the parties do so in their briefs.

¶ 6 (App. 2019) (reciting standard of review applicable to awards under A.R.S.

n.2 (App. 2018) (citing cases).

¶ 6 (App. 2019) (cleaned up).

¶ 17 (App. 2019); Walker v. Walker, No. 1 CA-CV 23-0036 FC, 2023 WL 6397297, at *5, ¶ 29 (Ariz. App. Oct.

¶ 9 (App. 2019) (“The spouse seeking to overcome a presumption of asset characterization has the burden of establishing the character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.”).

¶13 -58, ¶¶ 7, 10 (App. 2019), to argue that proceeds from personal injuries are presumptively separate.

¶ 11 (App. 2013) (parenting issues); ¶ 8 (App. 2018) (child support); ¶ 6 (App. 2019) (property).

¶ 11 (App. 2013) (parenting time); ¶ 8 (App. 2018) (child support); ¶ 6 (App. 2019) (property division and attorney’s fees).

2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the [family] court’s findings and orders.” n.2 (App. 2019) (citation omitted).

“Because we are unable to review the evidence, we assume it would support the court’s findings and conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2019).

¶ 6 (App. 2019); ¶ 13 (App. 2019).