Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lorenz-Auxier Financial Group, Inc. v. Bidewell, 772 P.2d 41.

25 citing documents.

Trembath v. Trembath Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State Farm v. Balzan Ariz. 2026
Grp., –21 (App. 1989) (rejecting the notion that a husband and wife constitute a single legal entity and recognizing that each spouse retains a separate legal identity).
Webber v. Webber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Webber v. Webber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Aguilar v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aguilar v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ward v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Morari 399 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Morari 399 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
¶ 14 In Lorenz-Auxier Financial Group, Inc. v. Bidewell, Leslie Bidewell, an Oregon resident, leased certain electronic equipment from Lorenz-Auxier and signed the lease agreements both in his individual capacity and as president of Infotel Arizona, Inc.
Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Grp., (“Debt incurred by one spouse while acting for the benefit of the marital community is a community obligation whether or not the other spouse approves it.”).
Sigmund v. Rea 248 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Sigmund v. Rea 248 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Group, , (citing Nationwide Res.
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Cardinal & Stachel, PC v. Curtiss 238 P.3d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
RACKMASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. Maderia 193 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
RACKMASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. Maderia 193 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Hrudka v. Hrudka 919 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hrudka v. Hrudka 919 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Lorenz-Auxier Financial Group
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Phoenix Arbor Plaza, Ltd. v. Dauderman 785 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Phoenix Arbor Plaza, Ltd. v. Dauderman 785 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
At the time of oral argument, the appellant took the position that this court's recent opinion in Lorenz-Auxier Financial Group, controlled the issue and that we should reverse on that basis.