Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite SOUTHWEST SAV. AND LOAN v. SunAmp Systems, 838 P.2d 1314.

26 citing documents.

Weber v. Kory Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
& Loan v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., (quoting Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins.
High Stakes v. Garver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Zaki v. Capstone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., –59 (App. 1992).
Hv & Canal v. Upper Iowa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., -59 (App. 1992) (quoting Stephen J. Burton, Breach of Contract and the Common Law Duty to Perform in Good Faith, 94 Harv.
Allstate v. Watts 418 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., (-51 (1991)); see also Fishman v. LaSalle Nat’l Bank, 247 F.3d 300, 302-03 (1st Cir. 2001) (“Common sense is as 4 Although Allstate contends it “did not have a direct contractual relationship” with Watts, it agrees that each party was “bound b
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys, Inc., , 557, , 1318 (App. 1992).
Mirchandani v. Bmo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Savings & Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., Great W. Bank v. LJC Dev., LLC, ¶ 44 (App. 2015) (awarding prevailing party attorneys’ fees under A.R.S.
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., (“[C]ourts are not constrained by textual omissions to abandon common sense and experience or to ignore the surrounding circumstances of an agreement.”).
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 39 Citing Southwest Savings and Loan Association v. SunAmp Systems, Inc., , 558-59, , 1319-20 (App.1992), the County contends its actions could not constitute a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the Agreement permitted the County to seek termination in certain circumstances, and the County did not act “for a reason beyond the risks” that Yaldma assumed.
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg 128 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg 128 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., -59 , -20 (App.1992).
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc.
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
& Loan Ass’n v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., (“If contracting parties cannot profitably use their contractual powers without fear that a jury will second-guess them under a vague standard of good faith, the law will impair the predictability that an orderly commerce requires.”); Villegas v. Transamerica Fin.
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
v. SunAmp Sys., Inc., , quoting Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. Gourmet Farms, 108 Cal.App.3d 181 , 166 Cal.Rptr.
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Bike Fashion Corp. v. Kramer 46 P.3d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
& , 558, , 1319 (App.1992)).
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002
Arizona's Towing Professionals, Inc. v. State 993 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Arizona's Towing Professionals, Inc. v. State 993 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Southwest Savings and Loan Association v. SunAmp Systems, Inc., , (power expressly retained under contract cannot be exercised in such a way as to *78 breach duty to act in good faith); Prineville Sawmill Co., Inc. v. United States, 859 F.2d 905, 912 (Fed.Cir.1988) (absolute right to reject all bids would render obligations illusory).