Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hamilton v. Municipal Court of Mesa, 788 P.2d 107.

40 citing documents.

Merrick, III v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Merrick, III v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lacy v. Lacy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Court of the City of Mesa
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Court, (citing Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., ).
Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Court, CHANDLER v. ELLINGTON Decision of the Court 107, 111 (App. 1989) (holding that the appellate court does not weigh the evidence; instead, the court decides whether substantial evidence supports the decision).
State v. Hon. rogers/hon. ditsworth/morgan 352 P.3d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hon. rogers/hon. ditsworth/morgan 352 P.3d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“The trial court is not bound to accept as true the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party.” (citation omitted)).
Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 16, (appellate court’s duty “does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence” but does include affirming the decision if substantial evidentiary support exists)
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-48, ¶ 13, -81 (App. 1998) (deferring to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight accorded to conflicting evidence and holding that reasonable evidence supported a finding); Hamilton v. Municipal Court (Mesa), (holding that an 7 Wife contends that Husband lacked standing to challenge Dr. Kelley’s appointment.
Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 16, accord Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 347-48, ¶ 13, 972 P.2d at 680-81
Bmo Harris v. Thruston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bmo Harris v. Thruston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Karp 336 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Karp 336 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Court of Mesa, –77, –10 (App. 1989).
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 108 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Lashonda M. v. Ades, Elijah M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Lashonda M. v. Ades, Elijah M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
P.3d 892 (App. 2003); Callender; P.2d 107 (App. 1989).
Lashonda M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 107 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Lashonda M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 107 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Callender; Hamilton v. Municipal Court of *82 City of Mesa
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court 988 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Tire Shredders, Inc. v. Pima County 965 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Tire Shredders, Inc. v. Pima County 965 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Arizona State Board of Regents v. Arizona State Personnel Board 953 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona State Board of Regents v. Arizona State Personnel Board 953 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review ASU states that the trial court’s decision to grant special action relief is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard
State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jonas 792 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1990