Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott, 796 P.2d 930.

173 citing documents.

Kelley v. Abdo 105 P.3d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County 96 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Douglas Auto & Equipment v. Industrial Commission 21 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Douglas Auto & Equipment v. Industrial Commission 21 P.3d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Relying on Post, , , the supreme court determined that the trial court’s findings did not approach the requirement that they be specific enough to allow us to test the validity of the judgment or its basis.
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Kelsey v. Kelsey 918 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Kelsey v. Kelsey 918 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-32 , -34 (App.1990) (finding insufficient evidence pursuant to Rule 52(a) for amount of child support and spousal maintenance awards where no mathematical basis was presented).
Hrudka v. Hrudka 919 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hrudka v. Hrudka 919 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law at trial court level so that court will have opportunity to correct them).
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY. 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Miller v. Board of Supervisors 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY. 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Miller v. Board of Supervisors 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
(specifically holding that the trial court must make findings of fact if the remedy sought is a preliminary injunction).
Hughes v. Hughes 869 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hughes v. Hughes 869 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rules of Civ.P., Rule 52(a)
Rainwater v. Rainwater 869 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rainwater v. Rainwater 869 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(trial court abused its discretion by failing to consider the receiving spouse’s contribution to the earning ability of the paying spouse and the receiving spouse’s reduction in income or career opportunities for the benefit of the paying spouse).
Brooks v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 839 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Brooks v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 839 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992