Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Swichtenberg v. Brimer, 828 P.2d 1218.

77 citing documents.

Moulton v. Napolitano 73 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Moulton v. Napolitano 73 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
When “jurisdictional fact issues are not intertwined with fact issues raised by a plaintiffs claim on the merits, the resolution of those jurisdictional fact issues is for the trial court.”
Interlott Technologies, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 72 P.3d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Interlott Technologies, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 72 P.3d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
(jurisdiction over claim cannot be conferred by court or be based upon estoppel of party to deny it exists); see also Guminski, 201 Ariz. at 184 ¶ 18, 33 P.3d at 518 (well-settled *456 rule that subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by estoppel).
Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. Powley 57 P.3d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. Powley 57 P.3d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Crowe v. Hickman's Egg Ranch, Inc. 41 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Crowe v. Hickman's Egg Ranch, Inc. 41 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Danielson v. Evans 36 P.3d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Danielson v. Evans 36 P.3d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
("Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, and can be raised at any stage of the proceedings.").
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Smithey v. Hansberger 938 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Smithey v. Hansberger 938 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows
Buckelew v. Town of Parker 937 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Buckelew v. Town of Parker 937 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(when jurisdictional issues are distinct from the merits, trial court may consider affidavits, depositions and exhibits, without converting motion to dismiss on such grounds to one for summary judgment).
Medina v. Arizona Department of Transportation 916 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Bils v. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle 880 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Bils v. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle 880 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Matter of Guardianship of Mikrut 858 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Matter of Guardianship of Mikrut 858 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust 869 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust 869 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993