Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc., 795 P.2d 1308.

34 citing documents.

Talking Rock v. Inscription Canyon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Talking Rock v. Inscription Canyon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dms Companies v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dms Companies v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Aow v. Scythian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Aow v. Scythian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
& Mgmt., Inc., -29 (App. 1990) (noting a contract may be "voidable for fraud, duress, lack of capacity, mistake, or violation of public purpose" (quoting U.S. Insulation, )); see also Jennings, 105 Ariz. at 172-73 (approving rescission as remedy for defrauded party to a cont
J Hamblen Et Ux v. Hon. hatch/winslow Memorial 398 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2017
J Hamblen Et Ux v. Hon. hatch/winslow Memorial 398 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2017
& Mgmt., Inc. (“SLS”), (concluding that “the doctrine of separability is inherent in the language of A.R.S.
Gullett ex rel. Estate of Gullett v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 390 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Gullett ex rel. Estate of Gullett v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 390 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
& Mgmt., Inc., , (arbitration provisions clearly lacking mutuality void for lack of consideration).
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
& Mgmt., Inc., -30, -13 (App. 1990).
Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
& Mgmt., Inc., (alteration in WB).
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 336 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El Destino 257 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El Destino 257 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
& Mgmt., Inc., -30 , -13 (App.1990) (citing Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg.
Smith v. Pinnamaneni 254 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Smith v. Pinnamaneni 254 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Weatherguard Roofing Co., Inc. v. DR WARD CONST., CO., INC. 152 P.3d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Weatherguard Roofing Co., Inc. v. DR WARD CONST., CO., INC. 152 P.3d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
and Mgmt., Inc., , ("General principles of contract law .
Harrington v. Pulte Home Corp. 119 P.3d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Harrington v. Pulte Home Corp. 119 P.3d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
and Mgmt., Inc., , (setting aside an arbitration provision that gave one party the absolute option of selecting either arbitration or litigation and of reconsidering its choice at any time prior to final judgment, finding it so “grossly inequitable” as to run “counter to the philosophy of encouraging
Schoneberger v. Oelze 96 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Schoneberger v. Oelze 96 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
& Mgmt., Inc., -30 , -1313 (App.1990) (public policy favoring arbitration presupposes existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate).
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Chrysler Corp. 6 P.3d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Chrysler Corp. 6 P.3d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993