Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 836 P.2d 1034.

27 citing documents.

Divris v. Myatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Divris v. Myatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Teeters & Assocs., (citation omitted).
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dj North v. Omnisource Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dj North v. Omnisource Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Fleming v. Fripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Fleming v. Fripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Teeters & Assocs., –30 (App. 1992) (discussing successor liability in Arizona).
Federal Insurance v. Skyquest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Federal Insurance v. Skyquest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Teeters & Assocs., (stating that “[w]hether a successor corporation will be liable for a predecessor corporation’s debts ‘depends upon the nature of the transaction which gives rise to the change of ownership’”).
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Home Builders Association v. City of Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Home Builders Association v. City of Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Teeters & Assocs., -31, -41 (App. 1992) (stating that “substantial similarity of ownership and control” between entities insufficient to impose successor liability).
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Miller v. Hehlen 104 P.3d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Teeters & Assocs., -31 , -41 (App.1992) (stating that "substantial similarity of ownership and control” between entities was insufficient to impose successor liability); Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Dev.
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z Manufacturing 74 P.3d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Teeters & Assoc., , , (“[T]he trial judge will not weigh evidence or determine questions of credibility, will not draw an inference where conflicting inferences are possible, and will defer to the jury on all disputed mate
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C. 63 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
A. R. Teeters & Assocs.
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996