Cited by

An attorney fees award is not mandated but “[i]t is within the trial court’s discretion to determine whether to award attorney’s fees to a party who has prevailed in a quiet title action and otherwise complied with the provisions of section 12– 1103(B).” Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys., ¶ 13 (App. 2012) 9 FLAUM v. HOERNIG, et al. Decision of the Court (“[R]esolution of an application for attorneys’ fees is a discretionary determination, not a me

§ 12-341.01(A) (authorizing a fee award to the “successful party”); Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys., (“It is within the trial court’s discretion to determine whether to award attorney’s fees to a party who has prevailed in a quiet title action and otherwise complied with the provisions of section 12–1103(B).”).

See Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys., (“One of the factors a trial judge can consider is whether assessing attorney’s fees against the unsuccessful party would cause an extreme hardship.”).

Scottsdale Mem'l Health Sys.

See also Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys., (“[T]he trial court may consider the same factors that are considered in determining whether to award attorney’s fees pursuant to A.R.S.

Scottsdale Mem'l Health Sys.

See Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys., (explaining that a court may consider the same factors that are considered in a contract action under A.R.S.

¶ 23 (App. 2009); Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys.

See Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, (reviewing a determination of extreme hardship for an abuse of discretion).

See, e.g., Scottsdale Mem’l. Health Sys., , (describing the superior court’s discretion regarding attorneys’ fees in quiet title actions); , , (explaining that a judicial act involves th

14 Scottsdale Mem’l Health Sys.

[14] Scottsdale Mem'l Health Sys.