Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Fenn v. Fenn, 847 P.2d 129.

75 citing documents.

Encinas v. Pompa 939 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In Re the Marriage of Tonnessen 941 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
In Re the Marriage of Tonnessen 941 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
1 , and resolve the other issues raised on appeal by memorandum decision.
State v. Palenkas 933 P.2d 1269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Palenkas 933 P.2d 1269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-120171 905 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-120171 905 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Waste Manufacturing & Leasing Corp. v. Hambicki 900 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Waste Manufacturing & Leasing Corp. v. Hambicki 900 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA v. Kohlhase 897 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA v. Kohlhase 897 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Adams v. Amore 895 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Adams v. Amore 895 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Rowley Plastering Co. v. Marvin Gardens Development Corp. 883 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Rowley Plastering Co. v. Marvin Gardens Development Corp. 883 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Finck v. Superior Court 868 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Finck v. Superior Court 868 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
“Courts may do many things in the best interests of children, but they cannot advance such interests by exercising jurisdiction that they lack.”
RDB Thomas Road Partnership v. City of Phoenix 883 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
RDB Thomas Road Partnership v. City of Phoenix 883 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Victor v. Victor 866 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Victor v. Victor 866 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
We begin with the proposition that “[e]very power that the superior court exercises in a dissolution proceeding must find its source in the supporting statutory framework.” , ( , ).
State v. Greene 866 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Greene 866 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Del E. Webb Cactus Development, Inc. v. Jessup 863 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Del E. Webb Cactus Development, Inc. v. Jessup 863 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993