Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, 830 P.2d 846.

26 citing documents.

Mountainside v. Flagstaff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mountainside v. Flagstaff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Johnson v. Queen creek/acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Johnson v. Queen creek/acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
MacKinney v. City of Tucson 299 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
MacKinney v. City of Tucson 299 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
No. 1, (analogizing public parks, swimming pools, and golf courses).
State v. Britton 250 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Britton 250 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 64 P.3d 836 Ariz. 2003
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 64 P.3d 836 Ariz. 2003
No. 1, n.6, n.6 (App. 1991) (holding Article 13, Section 7's grant of tax exempt status to districts is not the section’s sole purpose).
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 35 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 35 P.3d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, , Division One of this court accepted a similar argument.
City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
City of Tucson v. Rineer 971 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
No. 1, , (municipalities are permitted to establish, maintain and regulate parks and public grounds); Hiller v. City of Los Angeles, 197 Cal.App.2d 685 , 17 Cal.Rptr.
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Mohave County 937 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Mohave County 937 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
No. 1, , Maricopa County v. Black, 19 Ariz.App.
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 958 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
No. 1, , (attorneys’ fees award against county proper under A.R.S.
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
No. 1, , (attorneys' fees award against county proper under A.R.S.
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
section 12-348 was discussed in Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, -33 , -54 (App.1991), which held that legislative intent 10 and the express wording of the statute exempt political subdivisions from fee awards under the statute.