Cited by

Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (when a defendant establishes that a statute of limitations applies, the plaintiff must show that the limitations period was tolled); ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (the plaintiff has the burden to show entitlement to relief under the savings statute).

¶ 19 (App. 2021); see also Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

“Substantial evidence” is “any relevant evidence from which a reasonable mind might draw a conclusion.” Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (citation omitted).

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).

¶10 But it is a party’s burden to present evidence, not the court’s. See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”); ¶ 27 (App. 1998) (A party cannot fail to offer certain evidence and then complain that the superior court abused its discretion by ignoring that evidence.).

¶23 “The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.” Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

of Supervisors of Pinal Cnty., (declining to adjudicate an issue on appeal unaddressed in the superior court’s findings because a “final decision without findings was impossible without transforming this court into a factfinder resolving disputed issues of fact”); see also Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).

"'Substantial evidence' is defined as any 'relevant evidence from which a reasonable mind might draw a conclusion.'" ().

P. 12(b)(6) ; cf. Troutman v. Valley Nat'l Bank of Ariz. , , 517, , 814 (App. 1992) (stating burden to show applicability of statutory exception is "on the party asserting that exception").

P. 12(b)(6); cf. Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (stating burden of showing applicability of statutory exception is “on the party asserting that exception”).

at 350, ¶ 27; Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).

“‘Substantial evidence’ is ‘any relevant evidence from which a reasonable mind might draw a conclusion.’” ¶ 12 (App. 2003) (quoting Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Arizona, ).

3, ¶ 23, 7 P.3d at 117; (when statute grants benefit but also contains exception to benefit, and the exception does not appear in portion of statute granting the benefit but appears in another clause, party seeking benefit of exception has burden of proving its entitlement thereto); Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank, (party claiming to fall “within a recognized exception to the statute” has burden of showing exception applies).

“Substantial evidence” is “ ‘any relevant evidence from which a reasonable mind might draw a conclusion.’ ” Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Arizona, , ( , ).

See, e.g., Hummert, , , ("occupant kinematics” evidence); Bible, , Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank, , 518-19 & n. 2, , 815-16 & n. 2 (App.1992) (thermogram diagnostic test); -87 , -28 (1990) (silica gel blood alcohol test); , 241 — 42, -29 (1988) (phosphoglucomutase blood test), cert.

See Troutman v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Arizona, , (“The party who asserts a fact has the burden to establish that fact.”).