Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bird v. State Through Corbin, 821 P.2d 287.

32 citing documents.

Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(declining to award fees for a failure to comply with Rule 13(a)4).
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Greenwood v. State 175 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
v. State, , (discussing absolute and qualified immunity under A.R.S.
Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
section 12-820.01.A without considering the validity of the immunity statute); , (discussing absolute immunity under section 12-820.01.A but no discussion regarding validity of statute); , (discussing absolute and qualified immunity under A.R.S.
Doe v. State 7 P.3d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Doe v. State 7 P.3d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. National General Insurance 965 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. National General Insurance 965 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
20 n. 2, , 287 n. 2 (App.1991).
De La Cruz v. State 961 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
De La Cruz v. State 961 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
This case is unlike the case upon which the State relies, , where Division One of this court concluded that the State Structural Pest Control Commission enjoyed absolute immunity under § 12-820.01(B)(3) for its decision to license the exterminating company that inadequately treated Bird’s home for termites.
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Corbin, n. 2 , n. 2 (App.1991) (citing Flood Control Dist.
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Fidelty Security Life Insurance v. State 935 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Fidelty Security Life Insurance v. State 935 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Schabel v. DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL 920 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Schabel v. DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL 920 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
The district, , argues that it is immune in this case because the Schabels' claims concern district decisions (whether to seek or provide resources for the purchase of equipment or the construction or maintenance of facilities; whether and how to spend existing resources including allocations for equipment
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Galati v. Lake Havasu City 920 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
however, this court held that the legislature in A.R.S.
Goss v. City of Globe 883 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Goss v. City of Globe 883 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Even if we were to disregard those assertions, , the result here would be the same.
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Evenstad v. State 875 P.2d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Evenstad v. State 875 P.2d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993