Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ness v. Western Security Life Insurance, 851 P.2d 122.
- WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Satamian v. Great Divide Ariz. 2024
-
Satamian v. Great Divide
Ariz. 2024
Watercraft became final and non-appealable; or (2) a wherein neither claim accrued until Great Divide issued a final denial of coverage.
- Driggers v. Driggers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Driggers v. Driggers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- John R. France v. Arizona Counties Insurance Pool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
- John R. France v. Arizona Counties Insurance Pool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
- Vacc v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Vacc v. Chicago Title
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co., they raise claims that are excepted from coverage.
- Pickett v. Borg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Pickett v. Borg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Porthos v. Pulito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Porthos v. Pulito
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co., –03 (App. 1992); see also ARCAP 13(c).
- Hoffmann v. Hoffmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Hoffmann v. Hoffmann
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co., (stating an appellate court cannot consider evidence outside the trial court record).
- State v. Eagleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Eagleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa County 386 P.3d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa County
386 P.3d 416
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., -03 , -28 (App. 1992) (clarifying that an argument without citations to legal authority is insufficient to preserve an issue on appeal).
- Bill W. Castillo v. Thania N. Lazo 386 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- Bill W. Castillo v. Thania N. Lazo 386 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Eden v. Show Low
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., (providing that appellate review is limited to matters included in the record in the trial 1 Eden presents numerous other arguments that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint.
- Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., (“[A]n issue raised for the first time in appellant’s reply brief comes too late.”).
- Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Eden v. Show Low
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co., (limiting appellate review to matters included in record of proceedings in the trial court) (citing GM Dev.
- Bmo v. Reid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Bmo v. Reid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Vogue v. Maleknia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., see also ARCAP 13(a)(6) (requiring the appellant to support contentions with citations to legal authorities).
- Nesbitt v. Radisson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Nesbitt v. Radisson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLING 332 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLING
332 P.3d 76
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co., (“Arguments unsupported by any authority will not be considered on appeal.”).
- John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos
326 P.3d 279
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co., (argument waived if made without supporting authority).
- Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell
322 P.3d 204
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co., (no reliance where plaintiff did not accept defendants’ statements that he lacked disability insurance coverage, consulted attorney, and ultimately brought action against insurer); Wingate Land, LLC, 722 S.E.2d at 870 (no reliance where plaintiff seller asserted information in appra
- Gammage v. Als Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Gammage v. Als
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., ARCAP 13(a)(6) (stating that appellant’s opening brief must set forth “[a]n argument which shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”).
- Taylor-Bertling v. Foley 313 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley
313 P.3d 537
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Co., , C'[A]n issue raised for the first time in appellant’s reply brief comes too late.”).
- State v. Martin 235 P.3d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
State v. Martin
235 P.3d 1045
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , ("Arguments unsupported by any authority will not be considered on appeal.”).
- R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 229 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
229 P.3d 266
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , and the Department urges that we do so.