Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hampton v. Glendale Union High School District, 837 P.2d 1166.

48 citing documents.

Wheeler v. Deutsche Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Wheeler v. Deutsche Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Freelance Interpreting Services, Inc. v. State 133 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Freelance Interpreting Services, Inc. v. State 133 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Dist., , (Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is reviewed de novo.).
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Dist., , (citations omitted).
Energy Squared, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 56 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Energy Squared, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 56 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Wilderness World, Inc. v. Dep’t of Revenue
Arizona Libertarian Party v. Schmeral 28 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arizona Libertarian Party v. Schmeral 28 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, , , if the context and purpose of the legislation indicate that the term should be so construed.
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
at ¶ 18, 961 P.2d at ¶ 18
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Johnson v. Mofford 975 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Johnson v. Mofford 975 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Paging Network of Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 970 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Paging Network of Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 970 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Stapley v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Game & Fish Commission 966 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Stapley v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Game & Fish Commission 966 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
¶ 16 , and citing the District’s notations on her employment record of “RIF” and “Lay-Off’ as reasons for her termination, Hale claims a preferred right of reappointment under § 15-544(C).
Forino v. Arizona Department of Transportation 952 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Forino v. Arizona Department of Transportation 952 P.2d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
City of Phoenix v. Mangum 912 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
City of Phoenix v. Mangum 912 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Roddy v. County of Maricopa 911 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Roddy v. County of Maricopa 911 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Maricopa County 878 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Maricopa County 878 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Watahomigie v. BD. OF WATER QUALITY APP. 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Watahomigie v. BD. OF WATER QUALITY APP. 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Watahomigie v. Arizona Board of Water Quality Appeals 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Watahomigie v. Arizona Board of Water Quality Appeals 887 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Patterson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 865 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Patterson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 865 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Dist., , (interpreting statute); Libra Group, , (interpreting statutes and regulations).