Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566, 840 P.2d 1042.

50 citing documents.

Lane Draper v. Hon. gentry/state/nez 532 P.3d 1153 Ariz. 2023
Lane Draper v. Hon. gentry/state/nez 532 P.3d 1153 Ariz. 2023
Cause No. MH-90-648, (“We construe [substantial probability] to mean that there must be the real probability that the individual will suffer some danger of harm from his mental disorder if the condition is not treated.”).
In Re Mh2019-007059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Mh2019-007059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re: Linda D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re: Linda D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 36-540(A)(2); cf. MH 94-00592, 182 Ariz. at 443-45 (holding that a court may find an individual has a persistent and acute disability, even without evidence of an overt act or current behavior demonstrating that disability, so long as other clear and convincing evidence of the disability is presented) (citing In re MH 90-00566, ).
In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801 347 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801 347 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Mental Health No. MH 90-00566, (noting “involuntary commitment order affects important liberty interest” in deciding to address moot issue that may evade review).
In Re Mh-2008-000867 213 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh-2008-000867 213 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Due process is a requirement at involuntary commitment hearings “because civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of liberty.” In re MH 2004-001987, -60, ¶ 20 , -15 (App.2005) (quoting Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , ).
In re MH 2008-000028 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(citing In re Maricopa County No. MH-90-00566, , ).
In re MH 2008-000028 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(citing In re Maricopa County No. MH-90-00566, , ).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
[T]his section of the statute would not allow the involuntary treatment of a mentally-ill person without a showing to the level of ‘substantial probability1 of severe harm.” In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 196 P.3d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-001275 196 P.3d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 196 P.3d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
"`[T]he state must accord the proposed patient due process protection.'" MH XXXX-XXXXXX, 214 Ariz. at 321, ¶ 14, 152 *823 P.3d at 1204 (quoting In re Maricopa County No. MH 90-00566, , ).
In re MH 2007-001275 196 P.3d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
“ ‘[T]he state must accord the proposed patient due process protection.’ ” MH 2006-000749, 214 Ariz. at 321, ¶ 14 , 152 *220 P.3d at 1204 (quoting In re Maricopa County No. MH 90-00566, , ).
In Re Jesse M. 170 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Jesse M. 170 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(citing In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , ).
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
3 “[B]ecause civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of liberty, the state must accord the proposed patient due process protection.” In re Maricopa County No. MH 90-566
In re MH 2006-000023 150 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re MH 2006-000023 150 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566
In re MH 2004-001987 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In re MH 2004-001987 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
2493 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see Maricopa County Cause No. MH 90-00566, , (“[Bjeeause civil commitment eonsti- *260 tutes a significant deprivation of liberty, the State must accord the proposed patient due process protection”).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 120 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
2493 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see Maricopa County Cause No. MH 90-00566, , ("[B]ecause civil commitment constitutes *215 a significant deprivation of liberty, the State must accord the proposed patient due process protection.").
State v. Ehrlich 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
In Re Leon G. 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
State v. Ehrlich 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
chiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. text revision 1994) (defining paranoid schizophrenia and noting that “[t]he essential feature of the [disorder] is the presence of prominent delusions or auditory hallucinations in the context of a relative preservation of cognitive functioning and affect”); see, e.g., In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , (addressing a constitutional challenge to the commitment of a man rendered dangerous to himself an
In Re Leon G. 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
chiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. text revision 1994) (defining paranoid schizophrenia and noting that "[t]he essential feature of the [disorder] is the presence of prominent delusions or auditory hallucinations in the context of a relative preservation of cognitive functioning and affect"); see, e.g., In re Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , (addressing a constitutional challenge to the commitment of a man rendered dangerous to himself an
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Ciana H. 955 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Ciana H. 955 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Action No. MH-1140-6-93, , (statutes providing for involuntary commitment on basis of mental illness must be strictly construed); Matter of Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , (civil commitment involves “massive curtailment of liberty” that can have adverse social consequences or significant unfavorable stigma; proposed patient must be accorded due process protection).
State v. Ovind 924 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Ovind 924 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Specifically, the Defendant, relying on Matter of Maricopa County Cause No. MH-90-00566, , complains that a statute which submits her to the supervision of the board even if she is no longer mentally ill is overbroad.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592 897 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592 897 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Matter of Cause No. MH-90-00566
In Re the Appeal in Gila County of Mental Health Case No. MH 92-020 863 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In Re the Appeal in Gila County of Mental Health Case No. MH 92-020 863 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In the Matter of Maricopa County MH-90056, , *618 (App.1992).
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93. 863 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93. 863 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
■ In this case, as in In re Maricopa County No. MH 90-00566, , the treating psychiatrist, Dr. Wolgamott, testified that the patient was unable to understand and express an understanding of treatment alternatives because of his mental disorder.
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re Maricopa County No. MH-90-00566